In this lesson, we'll explore one of the biggest conversations in the world of work today: the four-day work week. Many companies and even governments are running experiments, or pilot programs, to see if working one less day can actually improve business and employee well-being. But is it just hype, or is this the future? We will analyze the results from recent trials, debate the pros and cons, and practice using language to speculate about future possibilities.

The Case for a 4-Day Work Week

Economist and sociologist Juliet Schor explains the benefits of a shorter work week for employees, companies, and society.

Video Transcript

I've been studying work since the 1980s and I've never seen anything like what's happening today. Pandemic-fueled anxiety is surging around the world. In the U.S., more than half of all employees report feeling stressed a lot of the day. Job quits are at record levels, running at 4 million a month. People are burning out. [ 00:30 ]

In response, a growing number of companies are offering a four-day, 32-hour week, but with five days of pay. Now, it's not a new idea, but the pandemic has turbocharged it. Employers are realizing that if they can rethink where people work, they can also rethink how many days they're on the job. Sound pretty great? But is it realistic? [ 00:59 ]

Well, actually, yes. Unlike policies in which one party profits at the expense of another, the four-day week can benefit workers, companies, and society. And it can even be a gateway for addressing climate change. [ 01:17 ]

But first, let's talk about the workplace. For nearly a decade, companies and governments have been experimenting with shorter hours with no cuts in pay. While the results do vary, the research shows that people are less stressed, value their jobs more, and have better lives outside of work. In most cases, they are as productive in four days as they are in five. [ 01:44 ]

Companies can also see benefits through lower turnover and a higher-quality applicant pool. Less burnout reduces health care costs, mistakes, and poor service. With colleagues, I'm studying four-day week trials now in progress in the United States and Ireland, with summer start dates for the UK, New Zealand, and Australia. We have thousands of employees participating. [ 02:09 ]

Healthwise, an education company, didn't wait for a trial to begin. In June, their employees were quitting in droves. By August, they'd implemented a four-day week. Six months later, CEO Adam Husney reports that people are dramatically happier and have never been more productive. Resignations and sick days are down, revenue has grown, and customer satisfaction scores are outstanding. [ 02:41 ]

Healthwise employees are spending their Fridays off doing family activities like sports or errands. One mother of young children reported that now she can occasionally manage a guilt-free pedicure. The four-day week can help with self-care and managing the daily stresses of systemic racism, sexism, and classism. [ 03:06 ]

Now, a key part of the model is that in return for the gift of the day off, people are willing to squeeze all their productivity into four days. So while they may be spending less time at work, they're not necessarily doing less work. The secret sauce is work reorganization, cutting out the least productive activities. Meetings are a prime target. [ 03:34 ]

Most companies reduce their frequency and length and the number of attendees. At Healthwise, people save time by messaging colleagues rather than making phone calls, which inevitably include some social chatting. They shifted personal tasks like doctor's appointments to the off day, and yes, the pace of work at the office does go up. [ 04:00 ]

One explained, "I'm not goofing off or looking at Facebook, which I was." But people have adapted, and they prefer getting their downtime as a whole day off rather than in snippets. [ 04:13 ]

Government initiatives have similar findings. In 2015, the city of Reykjavik and then the national government of Iceland started offering 36 and 35-hour weeks, eventually enrolling more than 2,500 employees. The results have been remarkable. Physical and mental stress went down, while work ethic, job satisfaction, work-life balance, and energy levels all improved. Productivity and service quality stayed the same or got better, and the trial was revenue neutral. Today, roughly 85% of all Icelandic employees are either on or eligible for these schedules. [ 05:01 ]

The governments of Spain and Scotland have announced four-day week trials in which they'll be subsidizing the fifth day's pay. Now, one reason for these successes is that with reduced work time, each hour typically becomes more productive. Norway and Denmark, the two European countries with the shortest average hours of work at about 1,380, have outsized productivity. France and Germany are similar. In contrast, the long-hours countries like the UK and Italy have much, much lower productivity. The U.S. historically led the world in productivity and would likely do better now if its work time weren't so high. [ 05:52 ]

While tech firms comprise the biggest group adopting four-day reduced-hour schedules, companies are also making the switch in banking, PR, marketing, and design, non-profits, consumer goods, even a restaurant chain. But it's also true that doing a hundred percent of the work in eighty percent of the time isn't feasible everywhere. Manufacturing was sped up decades ago. Many teachers and flight attendants need to slow down, not intensify. And of course, health care workers on the front lines of the pandemic need to work less, not more. [ 06:33 ]

Here, another government effort is instructive. In 2014, the city of Gothenburg in Sweden gave nurses at one of its facilities a six-hour day. As expected, the nurses' health and overall well-being improved, as did productivity and patient care. But in this trial, they hired new staff for the hours that weren't being covered. The striking finding was how much lower sick pay and unemployment benefits helped offset those additional salaries. [ 07:11 ]

Now, the Swedish case raises a bigger, more existential question: how much time should we be dedicating to work? In many countries, jobs are getting more, not less, demanding, and scarcity thinking—the idea that even rich countries need to tighten their belts—has taken hold. But really, we should be heading in the opposite direction. As digitization and artificial intelligence offer the chance to reduce work time, amid pandemic fatigue, we should be doubling down on restoring the quality of life and our social fabric, especially in wealthy countries where we already produce enough for everyone to have a good standard of living. [ 08:00 ]

And this path has the added benefit of addressing the climate crisis. How so, you may ask? Well, with the four-day week, there's the obvious impact of less commuting. But if we use productivity growth to continue to reduce hours of work, just by a couple of percent a year, we can create a longer-term dynamic of decarbonization. [ 08:27 ]

Research by me and others has shown this time and again across countries, across states, across households. One reason is that when people are time-stressed, they tend to choose faster and more polluting modes of travel and daily life activities. In contrast, when people get time rather than money, they tend to have a lower carbon footprint. But the bigger reason has to do with the size of the economy. By opting to work less, countries are choosing not to expand production to its max, thereby avoiding additional emissions. Carbon success stories like Germany and Denmark tend to have low annual hours. France and the Netherlands are also low on both carbon and work time. [ 09:18 ]

The four-day week is a down payment on a new way to live and work. And yes, we're going to need government help if we're going to move beyond the innovative companies that already see its virtues. But as the three-day weekend spreads, we can realize everyone deserves a right to free time. And that brings the logic of a universal basic income squarely into view, because without financial support, low earners can't afford to take that fifth day off. [ 09:53 ]

There's a lot of talk these days about the future of work and the opportunities that it offers. But there's more at stake here than opportunity. We have an imperative—an imperative to face the challenges of our current moment: the pandemic, burnout and depression, inequalities of race and income, the climate crisis. A four-day week addresses each one of these. For now, we're starting company by company, but as momentum builds and it becomes universal, we'll have made the transition from scarcity thinking to appreciating the true wealth that we possess: our ingenuity, our compassion, and our humanity. Thank you. [ 10:46 ]

Every company does it the way that works for them, and that's one of the things in our trial. We do coaching, and we work with the companies before they start to figure out, are they a company that can shut down for one day? Do they need to have 24/7 customer service available? So really, it depends, and we're seeing every type. [ 11:36 ]

Warm-up: Your Ideal Week (5 minutes)

What would you do with an extra day off every week? In a small group, brainstorm the potential pros and cons of a four-day work week. Think about it from the perspective of both employees and the company.

  • Pros (Benefits): What are the good things that might happen?
  • Cons (Drawbacks): What are the potential problems or trade-offs?

Take two minutes to think and write ideas on your own. Then, share your ideas with your group.

Jigsaw Reading: Global Pilot Programs (15 minutes)

Different countries have tested the four-day week with different results. Your class will be divided into three groups. Each group will read about one country's pilot program. After reading, you will share the key findings with students from the other groups.

As you read, focus on these questions:

  1. What was the main goal of the trial?
  2. What were the key results related to company performance and employee well-being?
  3. What challenges or concerns were mentioned?

Group A: UK Group B: Germany Group C: Portugal

Group A: The UK Trial

The UK ran one of the world's largest four-day week trials, involving over 60 companies and around 2,900 employees. The model was "100-80-100"—100% of the pay for 80% of the hours, in exchange for a commitment to maintain 100% productivity. The results were overwhelmingly positive. Companies reported that revenue largely stayed the same, and some even saw increases. Employee retention improved significantly, with the number of staff leaving dropping by 57%. Reports of employee burnout and stress fell by around 70%. At the end of the trial, an overwhelming majority—around 92%—of the companies decided to continue with the four-day week. The main challenge, it appears, was redesigning work processes to be more efficient in a shorter amount of time.

Group B: The German Trial

Germany began a six-month pilot program in early 2024 with 45 companies. The key focus was on tackling the country's severe skilled labor shortage. The theory was that a better work-life balance could make companies more attractive to new talent and improve employee retention. Early reports from the trial suggest that this is happening. Companies involved noted a major drop in sick days and a rise in employee motivation. While it is too early for final data on productivity, initial feedback indicates that teams are finding ways to work smarter, not harder. Some critics worry that this model might not work for manufacturing or other industries that depend on physical presence, but the participating service and tech companies are optimistic.

Group C: The Portugal Trial

Portugal's government-backed pilot program was unique because it was "revenue-neutral," meaning it came at no cost to the state. Around 40 private-sector companies participated. The results showed a significant improvement in workers' mental health. Anxiety and fatigue levels dropped by over 20%. Interestingly, the trial found that a four-day week may lead to employees redistributing their time. For example, men in the study spent more time on childcare, helping to rebalance domestic duties. While most companies reported a positive experience, a few found the transition difficult. This suggests that the success of a four-day week could depend heavily on a company's culture and its ability to adapt.

Language Focus: Speculating and Hedging

When we discuss the results of studies or predict future trends, we often don't know things for certain. We use specific language to show this uncertainty.

Modals of Speculation

We use modals like might, may, and could to talk about possibilities, not certainties.

  • Form: Modal + base verb (e.g., might work, could improve)
  • A four-day week could increase employee happiness. (It's a possibility.)

  • This model might not be suitable for all industries. (It's a possible negative outcome.)

  • More companies may adopt this policy in the future. (It's a possible future trend.)

Hedging Language

We use verbs and phrases like appears to, suggests, tends to, or indicates that to soften our claims. This makes our statements sound more academic and cautious.

  • The evidence suggests that productivity does not fall. (This is what the data shows, but we are being careful.)

  • It appears to be a successful model for smaller companies. (This is our observation, but it's not a final conclusion.)

Panel Role-Play: The Big Decision (20 minutes)

Imagine you work for a mid-sized local company (e.g., a software startup, a health clinic, a marketing agency). Your company is considering a six-month pilot program for a four-day work week based on the 100-80-100 model.

In groups of four, you will role-play a panel discussion to debate the decision. Each person will take on a different role. Read your role card and prepare your arguments. Use the modals and hedging language we just discussed.

business_center

The CEO

You are focused on the bottom line: profit, productivity, and company growth. You are open to the idea but worried about the risks.

favorite

The HR Manager

You are concerned with employee well-being, retention, and avoiding burnout. You are a strong supporter of the trial.

groups

The Union Rep

You represent the employees. You want to ensure that pay isn't cut and that the workload does not become impossible in four days.

support_agent

The Customer Service Manager

You're worried about customer satisfaction. How will the company serve clients for five business days if employees only work four?

Discussion Questions

  1. What are the biggest potential benefits of this pilot program for our company?
  2. What are the biggest risks or trade-offs we need to consider?
  3. How could we measure the success of this trial?

Mini-Write: Trial Proposal (15 minutes)

Think about a real workplace you know—it could be a café, a school, a retail store, or an office. How would you propose a one-month, four-day week trial there?

Quickly plan a 100-word proposal. Think about:

  • What is the main goal? (e.g., reduce staff burnout, improve weekend service, attract new hires).
  • How would it work? (e.g., Are all staff off on Friday? Do they work in rotating shifts?).
  • What is one key risk, and how could you manage it?

Share your idea with a partner.

Exit Ticket: One Key Metric (5 minutes)

If you were the manager of this trial, what is the one most important Key Performance Indicator (KPI) you would track to decide if the pilot was a success? Why?

(Examples of KPIs: daily sales, customer satisfaction scores, number of sick days, project completion time, employee survey results on stress levels.)

Think about it for a moment, and be ready to share your answer if your teacher calls on you.

Vocabulary Review

Word Definition Example
pilot program a small-scale, preliminary study conducted to evaluate feasibility, time, cost, and improve upon a design prior to performance of a full-scale project Our company is launching a pilot program to test the new software before everyone uses it.
productivity the rate at which goods are produced or work is completed The team's productivity increased after they reorganized their workflow.
burnout a state of emotional, physical, and mental exhaustion caused by excessive and prolonged stress Working 12-hour days for a month led to serious burnout for the entire staff.
retention the ability of a company to keep its employees from leaving Good benefits and a positive work culture are key to high employee retention.
trade-off a balancing of factors all of which are not attainable at the same time; a giving up of one thing in return for another Working from home offers more flexibility, but the trade-off is sometimes feeling isolated.

Exercise

keyboard_arrow_up